Wednesday, October 3, 2007
King Memorial
My first feeling on this article was that there was something inherently wrong with choosing a Chinese artist to create the MLK memorial, but it has taken me a while to formulate why. While I think that the sense of "world unity" is hopeful in this situation- it is also unrealistic. The sad fact of the matter is that minority artists are still greatly underrepresented in public art contracts. This is a widespread issue- last year alone MOMA's exhibitions were made up of 60% white males, 17.5% white females, 17.5% minority females and 5% minority males. If you only look at large solo shows the figures are worse- 80% WM, 13% WF, 7% MF and 0% MM! By not choosing an artist of African-American decent and hiding behind "reverse-discrimination" they are chipping away at the work that Martin Luther King strived to achieve. He wanted equality for everyone but lets be honest- that started with equal rights and equal access for African Americans. A memorial is more than just a statue or a piece of architecture. It is representative of that historical movement or person or place and I think that actual physical depiction is only half of what goes into a good piece- there has to be emotion there- emotion that one can only get from a shared history or experience.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Hi Aasta-Thanks for the statistics. What is your source for these, please?
You make a good point about this memorial being an opportunity to show the work of an African American artist and move the statistics at least one little step toward equality. Given that there so few African Americans participating in the "official" art system, what happens if the committee puts out a call for proposals and they receive very little response from African Americans, and none of those proposals are what they're looking for? If they are committed to finding an African American artist, what might be the next step then?
Post a Comment